Ticket Splitter Take the quiz
Issue explainer

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Programs

Diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, refers to offices, trainings and policies meant to support people from different backgrounds. Texas banned DEI offices at public universities in 2023 and extended limits to K-12 schools in 2025, and the federal government ended its own DEI programs in 2025. Voters disagree on whether these programs promote fairness or cause unfair treatment.

The basics

DEI is a broad label. Supporters call it inclusion work; critics often call it identity-based preferences. This page uses the neutral term DEI programs.

On January 20, 2025, President Trump ordered federal agencies to eliminate DEI offices, chief diversity officer positions and equity action plans1. That order reversed an approach begun under a 2021 order from the previous administration, Executive Order 139851.

On January 21, 2025, a second order revoked Executive Order 11246, a 1965 order on federal contractor hiring2. It requires federal contractors and grant recipients to certify that they do not run DEI programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws2. It also directed the Attorney General to plan investigations of large companies, nonprofits and universities with big endowments2.

Supporters of DEI programs say they help students and workers from different backgrounds succeed. Opponents say they sort people by race or sex and that equal treatment is already required by civil rights law.

Key terms

DEI office
Under Texas SB 17, a university unit set up to influence hiring with respect to race, sex, color or ethnicity, to give special benefits based on race, color or ethnicity, or to run trainings designed in reference to race, color, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation3.
DEI statement
A written statement about a person's commitment to diversity, sometimes requested in hiring. Texas public universities may not require or solicit one3.
Executive Order 11246
A 1965 order that required affirmative action plans by federal contractors. It was revoked on January 21, 20252.
Social transitioning
Changing a name, pronouns or presentation to match gender identity. Texas SB 12 bars public schools from assisting with it9.

In Texas

Senate Bill 17, signed on June 17, 2023, and effective January 1, 2024, bars Texas public colleges and universities from keeping DEI offices, requiring DEI statements, giving hiring preferences based on race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin, or requiring DEI training34. It does not apply to course instruction, research, student organizations' activities, or admissions and recruitment3.

Senate Bill 12, signed on June 20, 2025, and effective September 1, 2025, extends similar limits to K-12 public schools5. It also bars schools from authorizing or sponsoring student clubs based on sexual orientation or gender identity, instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity, and staff assistance with social transitioning96. On February 20, 2026, a federal judge in Houston temporarily blocked four parts of SB 12 while the lawsuit proceeds, but only for the Houston, Katy and Plano districts named in the lawsuit67. Other districts, including those in Tarrant County, are not covered by that order6.

Senate Bill 37, signed on June 20, 2025, changed university governance, including reviews of curriculum and degree programs and rules for faculty senates8.

How people see it

The strongest case for each view, in terms its supporters would recognize. We don't pick a side.

Expand DEI programs

Supporters say gaps in pay, health, and graduation rates by race and sex are real and call for active effort to close them. They argue DEI offices and trainings help students and workers from many backgrounds feel welcome and succeed, which benefits everyone.

Keep them, let institutions decide

Some say universities, schools and employers should decide for themselves what support programs they need. They see state and federal bans as heavy-handed and as chilling speech, clubs and academic freedom.

Keep support for all, end preferences

Others support mentoring, tutoring and outreach open to every student, such as first-generation or low-income students, while ending race or sex preferences and required diversity statements. They argue help should be based on need, not identity.

Ban DEI offices and training in public institutions

Supporters of the Texas laws say taxpayer-funded schools should treat every person as an individual and stay neutral on contested ideas about race, sex and gender. They argue DEI offices grew into bureaucracies that pushed one viewpoint and compelled speech through statements and trainings.

Ban it and use federal funding to enforce

Supporters say DEI programs often amount to illegal discrimination under the Civil Rights Act and the 2023 Supreme Court admissions ruling. They back cutting federal contracts and grants to organizations that keep such programs and investigating those that do not comply.

Who decides

  • President and federal agencies: Set rules for the federal workforce, contractors and grant recipients, and enforce civil rights laws.
  • U.S. Congress: Writes civil rights laws and controls federal education and contract funding.
  • Texas Legislature and Governor: Passed SB 17, SB 12 and SB 37 governing Texas public universities and schools.
  • University regents and local school boards: Carry out state law and set campus and district policies.
  • Federal courts: Decide challenges, such as the pending lawsuit over parts of SB 12.

Questions to ask a candidate

  • Should Texas keep, change or repeal its 2023 and 2025 DEI laws?
  • Should public schools be allowed to sponsor clubs on sexual orientation or gender identity?
  • How should schools support first-generation, low-income or struggling students?
  • Should federal funding depend on whether a school or contractor has DEI programs?

Last reviewed 2026-09-26. Spotted something wrong? Every claim links to its source so you can check it yourself.

Sources

  1. Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing (Executive Order, January 20, 2025)The White House
  2. Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Executive Order, January 21, 2025)The White House
  3. SB 17 enrolled text, 88th LegislatureTexas Legislature Online
  4. Bill history: SB 17, 88th LegislatureTexas Legislature Online
  5. Bill history: SB 12, 89th LegislatureTexas Legislature Online
  6. Federal judge temporarily blocks Plano ISD from enforcing parts of Texas law banning DEIThe Dallas Morning News
  7. Federal Court Halts Enforcement of Key Provisions of Law in Three Texas School DistrictsACLU of Texas (plaintiffs' counsel)
  8. Bill history: SB 37, 89th LegislatureTexas Legislature Online
  9. SB 12 enrolled text, 89th LegislatureTexas Legislature Online